Notify the network
A shelter or rescue gives licensed Colorado organizations verifiable notice at least three open days before euthanasia.
HB24-1114 · Ready for a stronger return
Before a healthy or treatable pet is killed, give Colorado’s licensed shelters and rescues time to say yes.
Quick answer
It is a proposed Colorado law that would require brief, verifiable notice before a healthy or treatable shelter pet is euthanized, giving a qualified, PACFA-licensed shelter or rescue time to accept custody. It preserves immediate euthanasia for irremediable suffering and carefully defined public-safety exceptions.
Why now
Colorado is closer than it looks
Colorado already has a large, licensed network of shelters and rescues, a pet-loving public, and enough placement demand to bring tens of thousands of dogs and cats in from other states. The Rescue Act asks that a small share of that capacity reach Colorado animals before their last moment.
Licensed network
402shelter and rescue registrants were identified as affected in the 2024 fiscal note.Read the fiscal noteThe solution
A final, verifiable safety step
A shelter or rescue gives licensed Colorado organizations verifiable notice at least three open days before euthanasia.
If a PACFA-licensed shelter or rescue accepts responsibility, the animal is held for transfer—not indefinitely, but long enough to complete the handoff.
The accepting organization has two open days to take possession and receives all material medical and behavioral information.
Immediate humane euthanasia remains available for irremediable suffering, and statutory exceptions protect the public from dangerous or court-ordered cases.
In plain language
If a qualified organization is ready to take custody, share the records, transfer the animal, and let that organization assume the work and responsibility.
What the bill did—and did not—do
The 2024 bill was not an absolute prohibition on euthanasia. It created a rescue-notice process for animals who had a remaining lifesaving option and specifically exempted urgent suffering and defined public-safety cases.
Read the introduced billProtected by the process
Exempt from delay
Public-safety exceptions
The 2024 fight
A compassionate proposal met an established wall
The bipartisan House sponsorship paired Representative Mandy Lindsay with Representative Ryan Armagost; Senator Kevin Priola was the Senate sponsor.
Individuals, foster-based rescues, lifesaving shelters, and No Kill Colorado described animals lost when help existed but could not reach them in time.
The official record shows coordinated opposition from major shelters, statewide associations, municipal and county interests, and other established animal-welfare voices.
Four amendments passed without objection, but the motion to advance the amended bill failed. It was then postponed indefinitely.
Reasonable questions deserve direct answers
No. The introduced bill expressly allowed immediate euthanasia when a licensed veterinarian certified that an animal faced a grave prognosis and severe, unremitting pain even with prompt comprehensive care.
The bill provided civil-liability protection for the transferring organization when it gave the receiving licensee all material information about the animal.
No. The process used defined notice and pickup windows. A rescue had to commit and take possession promptly; silence did not create an unlimited hold.
The final fiscal note estimated an initial state cost of $523,980 and $233,154 in the following year, largely for the notification system and oversight. A renewed bill should use modern shelter software, phased implementation, and stakeholder input to reduce cost while preserving verifiable statewide notice.
It should not. Frontline staff work under enormous pressure. The policy changes the system around them by adding partners, visibility, and a final off-ramp before death—not by assigning personal blame.
Lifesaving evidence library
These No Kill Advocacy Center guides address the practical questions behind the Rescue Act: which animals can be helped, how community cats can be kept out of shelters, how to answer predictable objections, and why lifesaving can be fiscally responsible.
Behavior challenges should lead to careful assessment, treatment, and qualified placement—not an automatic death sentence when a capable organization can help.
Read or download the guide ↗Sterilize-and-return programs reduce shelter intake and killing, lower complaint calls and disease risk, and preserve shelter capacity for other animals.
Read or download the guide ↗A practical guide to concerns about rescue transfers, cost, public safety, warehousing, open admission, and the public’s role in lifesaving.
Read or download the guide ↗Lifesaving can reduce killing-related costs, increase adoption and community support, and generate economic activity for local businesses.
Read or download the guide ↗The underlying framework
The official online No Kill 101 guide explains the lifesaving programs that replace killing with practical, humane alternatives.
Read No Kill 101A note to Colorado lawmakers
A renewed Rescue Act can be drafted with clear definitions, auditable notice, firm deadlines, full disclosure, enforcement that prioritizes compliance, and explicit protections for suffering animals, public safety, and shelter workers.
The policy question is simple: when a regulated organization is ready to assume custody and responsibility, should a savable animal be killed instead?
One decision can reopen the door
Ask your representatives to support a renewed Colorado Rescue Act. Invite your organization to stand with the shelters, rescues, advocates, and residents who believe every healthy and treatable homeless pet deserves a real chance.
Sources and methodology
Bill mechanics, votes, testimony, fiscal estimates, and 2025 animal figures link to public primary records. Statewide dog and cat totals are calculated from facility-reported PACFA data; as with any self-reported administrative dataset, they should be read with that limitation in mind.
HB24-1114 bill page and introduced textColorado General Assembly
↗02February 29, 2024 committee hearing summaryColorado General Assembly
↗03Final fiscal noteColorado Legislative Council Staff
↗042025 shelter and rescue statisticsColorado Department of Agriculture / PACFA
↗05Colorado Rescue Act campaign and backgroundNo Kill Colorado
↗06No Dog Left BehindNo Kill Advocacy Center
↗07Protecting Community CatsNo Kill Advocacy Center
↗08Countering the OppositionNo Kill Advocacy Center
↗09Dollars & SenseNo Kill Advocacy Center
↗10No Kill 101No Kill Advocacy Center
↗