HB24-1114 · Ready for a stronger return

The Colorado Rescue ActOne more chance.Thousands more lives.

Before a healthy or treatable pet is killed, give Colorado’s licensed shelters and rescues time to say yes.

A straightforward safeguard for the animals who can still be saved.

Quick answer

What is the Colorado Rescue Act?

It is a proposed Colorado law that would require brief, verifiable notice before a healthy or treatable shelter pet is euthanized, giving a qualified, PACFA-licensed shelter or rescue time to accept custody. It preserves immediate euthanasia for irremediable suffering and carefully defined public-safety exceptions.

Colorado has room to choose local lifesaving.
25,103dogs and cats transferred into Colorado in 2025
12,393reported non-live dog and cat outcomes in 2025
See the data
01

Why now

Colorado is closer than it looks

We do not need to rebuild the whole system.

Colorado already has a large, licensed network of shelters and rescues, a pet-loving public, and enough placement demand to bring tens of thousands of dogs and cats in from other states. The Rescue Act asks that a small share of that capacity reach Colorado animals before their last moment.

Licensed network

402shelter and rescue registrants were identified as affected in the 2024 fiscal note.Read the fiscal note
02

The solution

A final, verifiable safety step

Notice. A short window. A willing lifesaver.

01

Notify the network

A shelter or rescue gives licensed Colorado organizations verifiable notice at least three open days before euthanasia.

02

Let a licensee say yes

If a PACFA-licensed shelter or rescue accepts responsibility, the animal is held for transfer—not indefinitely, but long enough to complete the handoff.

03

Move promptly

The accepting organization has two open days to take possession and receives all material medical and behavioral information.

04

Protect safety and mercy

Immediate humane euthanasia remains available for irremediable suffering, and statutory exceptions protect the public from dangerous or court-ordered cases.

In plain language

If a qualified organization is ready to take custody, share the records, transfer the animal, and let that organization assume the work and responsibility.

What the bill did—and did not—do

Compassion without abandoning public safety.

The 2024 bill was not an absolute prohibition on euthanasia. It created a rescue-notice process for animals who had a remaining lifesaving option and specifically exempted urgent suffering and defined public-safety cases.

Read the introduced bill

Protected by the process

Healthy and treatable pets with a licensed organization ready to help.

One more chance before an irreversible decision.

Exempt from delay

Animals who are irremediably suffering.

Mercy is not postponed when severe pain cannot be relieved.

Public-safety exceptions

Dangerous, court-ordered, and documented repeated serious-bite cases.

The bill preserved carefully defined safety safeguards.
03

The 2024 fight

A compassionate proposal met an established wall

The first attempt lost. The idea did not.

HB24-1114 introduced

The bipartisan House sponsorship paired Representative Mandy Lindsay with Representative Ryan Armagost; Senator Kevin Priola was the Senate sponsor.

Advocates and rescuers testified

Individuals, foster-based rescues, lifesaving shelters, and No Kill Colorado described animals lost when help existed but could not reach them in time.

Large institutions opposed it

The official record shows coordinated opposition from major shelters, statewide associations, municipal and county interests, and other established animal-welfare voices.

The bill fell 3–10

Four amendments passed without objection, but the motion to advance the amended bill failed. It was then postponed indefinitely.

Reasonable questions deserve direct answers

What opponents worried about—and what a stronger bill can solve.

Would suffering animals be forced to wait?

No. The introduced bill expressly allowed immediate euthanasia when a licensed veterinarian certified that an animal faced a grave prognosis and severe, unremitting pain even with prompt comprehensive care.

Would shelters carry liability after transfer?

The bill provided civil-liability protection for the transferring organization when it gave the receiving licensee all material information about the animal.

Would every animal be held indefinitely?

No. The process used defined notice and pickup windows. A rescue had to commit and take possession promptly; silence did not create an unlimited hold.

What about implementation cost?

The final fiscal note estimated an initial state cost of $523,980 and $233,154 in the following year, largely for the notification system and oversight. A renewed bill should use modern shelter software, phased implementation, and stakeholder input to reduce cost while preserving verifiable statewide notice.

Does this attack shelter workers?

It should not. Frontline staff work under enormous pressure. The policy changes the system around them by adding partners, visibility, and a final off-ramp before death—not by assigning personal blame.

Lifesaving evidence library

Go deeper on the policies that make rescue possible.

These No Kill Advocacy Center guides address the practical questions behind the Rescue Act: which animals can be helped, how community cats can be kept out of shelters, how to answer predictable objections, and why lifesaving can be fiscally responsible.

The underlying framework

No missing file required.

The official online No Kill 101 guide explains the lifesaving programs that replace killing with practical, humane alternatives.

Read No Kill 101

A note to Colorado lawmakers

This is a narrow safeguard with a statewide result.

A renewed Rescue Act can be drafted with clear definitions, auditable notice, firm deadlines, full disclosure, enforcement that prioritizes compliance, and explicit protections for suffering animals, public safety, and shelter workers.

The policy question is simple: when a regulated organization is ready to assume custody and responsibility, should a savable animal be killed instead?

  • Preserve humane and public-safety exceptions.
  • Require verifiable notice to eligible PACFA licensees.
  • Set short, enforceable response and transfer windows.
  • Require complete medical and behavioral disclosure.
  • Measure transfers, denials, exceptions, and outcomes.

One decision can reopen the door

Help Colorado choose life when life is still possible.

Ask your representatives to support a renewed Colorado Rescue Act. Invite your organization to stand with the shelters, rescues, advocates, and residents who believe every healthy and treatable homeless pet deserves a real chance.

Sources and methodology

Built for scrutiny.

Bill mechanics, votes, testimony, fiscal estimates, and 2025 animal figures link to public primary records. Statewide dog and cat totals are calculated from facility-reported PACFA data; as with any self-reported administrative dataset, they should be read with that limitation in mind.